The project covered sites spread over a relatively large area accessible only by boat before the end of construction. In addition it was located on the coast which makes it prone to weather. This required an efficient training program and rigorous follow-up to be able to manage all relevant sustainability aspects on the different sites.

The works involved:

• Lepsøybrua, a 800-metre-long high bridge from Skjeltene on the mainland over to Lauka and Hestøya

• Laukebrua, a 110-metre long bridge

• Hamnaskjersundbrua, 200 meter long bridge in Hamnaskjersund

• The Haramsfjord tunnel from Hestøya to Austnes, 3 500 metres

• Marine deposits of excavated material on Lepsøyrevet, 800 000 m3

• Road on marine deposits of excavated material from Skjeltene to Hestøya, 2 700 metres

• Road and intersection at Austnes, 700 metres

• New road on Longva, 1100 metres

• The Nogvafjord tunnel, from Longva on Flemsøya to Fjørtofta, 5700 metres

• Fjørtoftfjord tunnel, from Fjørtofta to Myklebust on Harøya, 3700 meters

• Burberg tunnel, a tunnel preserve local wildlife on Fjørtofta, 170 metres

• Road on sea fill over Lepsøyrevet, 2700 metres

• New road over Fjørtofta, 3100 metres

• New road on Harøya, 1300 metres

• A dam with an asphalt core between Lauka and Hestøya, length 500 meters, height 12 meters

This project achieved an 8% reduction in embodied carbon emissions thanks to its selection and management of physical resources. It also re-used 140,000 tonnes of material.

People and communities

Dialogue with the local community has been conducted at several levels as informal contact, local meetings pre-covid as well as questionnaires at regular intervals. Several issues recorded through the community engagement programme and during construction led to action to accommodate the requests in addition to planned proactive measures:

• Early establishment of asphalt on road with a lot of construction-related traffic passing through a small community to reduce dust and vibration

• Requests of contribution in the form of machines and excavated material to establish a running track and activity park at Fjørtofta

• Donation of a garage that was planned for demolition to an amcar club following a request

• Coordination regarding marine waste with Plastpiratene

• Donation of surplus material to an archery club at Harøya

Structured follow-up of the local community related to satisfaction with communication and site traffic through a targeted questionnaire at regular intervals. This also helped identify areas and aspects of focus. The percentage of respondents satisfied with site traffic has been stable at above 98,5% throughout the construction phase.

Ecology and biodiversity

A tunnel was constructed at Fjørtofta to avoid disturbing a nesting ground for a known population of the Eurasian Eagle-Owl.

To accommodate the Eurasian Eagle-Owl a permanent landfill was reduced from 300 000 m3 to 200 000 m3 as a part of zoning planning in 2020 based on dialogue with a local ornithologist who had been monitoring the owl population in the area over the last decade.

The water environment

Prevention of marine plastic pollution is a major focus for the project defined by the client.

Plastic remains from the explosives used in the tunnel are deposited along with the excavated material in the sea. To manage the marine waste associated with the project a goal was established to become “Marine Waste positive”. There were two components of this strategy:

Minimising the marine waste by:

• using electronic detonators reducing the quantities of plastic

• implementing routines to remove plastic remains before loading blasted rock on to trucks

Removing marine waste by:

• Implementing routines to collect visible plastic remains after depositing the excavated masses in the sea

• Arranging clean-ups

The total potential for plastic deposited in the sea as part of the project was calculated. The measured quantities collected as part of regular routines and clean-ups are 1,3 times larger than the maximum quantities estimated released.

The client identified a local grassroot organisation called Plastpiratene doing beach cleanups etc. as an important link. They were actively consulted during the construction phase by Skanska for example by monitoring any increased marine pollution during the construction period. Help has also been provided to disposal of marine waste collected by Plastpiratene. The feedback has been very positive and Plastpiratene has publicly given credit to the project.

Physical resources

A reduction of greenhouse gas emissions of 7 373 tonnes CO2e was achieved. This equals 8% reduction.

The major contributors were:

• Products with low documented greenhouse gas emissions

• The use of the cover meter to measure the thickness of sprayed concrete over the rebars in the tunnel to reduce the necessary quantities of sprayed concrete.

• Boats connected to the electrical grid when docked

Engaging the workforce and suppliers of the project in sustainability on the operational level. This resulted in implementing measures that reduced the waste (excluding excavated material) by 420 tonnes.

The major contributors were:

• Avoiding demolition of the foundations for a temporary workshop and forwarding it to a neighbour for future use

• Donating concrete weights to local farmers etc., granite blocks to a sports team construction purposes, a complete garage to an Amcar club etc.

• Reuse of damaged ventilation ducts from tunnel construction as cover during the hardening of concrete

22 600 tonnes of excavated material was donated to local purposes including for example upgrading hiking trails and a running track

Beneficially reusing over 66% of excavated material and 100% of topsoils onsite.

The background for undertaking a CEEQUAL assessment on this project was the intention of following up the ambitions from the strategy phase in a structured manner as well as creating incentives to go beyond the minimum requirements.

Financial benefits

The most concrete financial benefit directly attributed to CEEQUAL was the engagement of the workforce leading to several “grassroot” reuse initiatives.

Added value included:

• Transforming the sustainability efforts into something more tangible for the workforce, administration as well as the client. This in turn helps creating engagement

• Forcing the project to set goals for an extended set of environmental aspects.

Outcomes from using CEEQUAL

The main differences a result of implementing CEEQUAL on the project was structuring the follow up of the environmental goals on the project on a regular basis with the result of more people becoming engaged with the sustainability efforts on the project.